That a Mossad agent or other native Israeli wrote the Amerithrax The text(s) to produce a red herring for investigators: the possibility The ‘mistakes’ (ie interpolations of Hebrew forms) however are NOT So, the Anthrax Truther is seeing what he wants to see, he's ignoring everything that doesn't fit his beliefs, and an abrupt change from mostly "Hebrewized" T's to mostly "NOT-Hebrewized" T's is somehow proof to him that someone deliberately tried to add Hebrew elements into the media anthrax letter to point at Mossad agents as being behind the attacks: He simply ignores (or fails to see) that there are T's in the media letter that are also off-center to the left. On all other documents, if the vertical line is off-center, it is off-center to the left. Otherwise Hebrewized cast, when taken to an extreme.ĭeciphering that claim, he seems to be saying: The two T's with the off-center vertical line on the media letter are both off-center to the right. The RIGHT side of the crossbar, not the left which gives it a Daleth or
Of the Brokaw text: he, the printer, has a slight propensity to favor And, he writes:Īnd if one looks ever-so-closely at those 'T's on the outside of theĮnvelopes, one will find that that slight imperfection seen in theĭistribution of the crossbar is OPPOSITE that of the Hebrewized forms If eight T's in the media letter are all "Hebrewized" (in two different ways) and no T in any other document is "Hebrewized," then that is proof of his theory. When I showed him examples from the Internet where people were commonly drawing the vertical lines on T's off-center, he changed his theory. (vagaries or chance variants) of the printing 'DEATH' of line 3 are simply not credible as 'accidents'
Too-far-but-not-quite-so-far-as-that-of-line-4 'T' crossbar of the word Too-far-to-the-left 'T' crossbar of the word 'DEATH' of line 4, AND the And he simply does not believe any theory where both the highlighted A's and T's fit perfectly. He ignores things which do not fit with his theory. The Anthrax Truther also totally ignores the fact that some of the A's in the media letters are traced over in the same way as the T's. Thus, by no stretch of the imagination can the T in DEATH be called a "perfect" Dalet. (The red mark above the T in the illustration below is the cursive version of the Hebrew Dalet):įurthermore, while the five Dalets in the illustration above are somewhat different from one another, they all have one thing in common: They all have a point or mark at the left top of the crossbar, which the T in "DEATH" (and every Ashuri Dalet I've ever seen) definitely does not have. But, what is a "perfect" Dalet (or Daleth)? Many exhibits on the Internet seem to be done by one pen stroke, which is definitely not the case with the T, but all the Dalets show a darkened or heavy horizontal bar across the top, which is NOT shown in the T in example he claims is a "perfect" Dalet. In a post HERE, he also sees the T in the second spelling of "DEATH" in the Brokaw letter as a "perfect" Dalet. This lack of a pattern he inexplicably sees as a "pattern." (Click HERE.) And, in no other anthrax document does he see any of the T's as being "Hebrewized" in either fashion. NONE show BOTH "Hebrewized" characteristics. Two others are "Hebrewized" by the fact that the vertical line in the T's are not perfectly centered, they are offset slightly to the right. Six are "Hebrewized" by tracing over the horizontal bar in the T. In the media letter, he sees all the T's as being "Hebrewized," although not all in the same way. 'T's in Brokaw text: 8/8= 100% HebrewizedĪll other KNOWN texts from same printer: 0/23= 0% Hebrewized. He wants the I and C to be close together and resemble the Hebrew character Aleph instead of merely being further than "normal" from the adjacent characters R and A.Īnd this desire to see things that aren't really there is most clear in the two main points of his theory: He just wants to see things that confirm his beliefs. All that exists are normal variations in human handwriting. The Anthrax Truther is finding "similarities" where no real similarities exist.